Lacson Slams Flood Control Response as 'Tinimbang Ngunit Kulang' Despite Recent Progress

Senator flags systemic gaps in anti-corruption efforts amid ongoing infrastructure projects

Manila, Philippines – Senator Panfilo Lacson has delivered a sharp critique of the government’s handling of flood control anomalies, describing the overall response as “tinimbang ngunit kulang” (weighed but found wanting), even as he acknowledged some gains in infrastructure and disaster mitigation. His remarks, reported by the Manila Bulletin on Saturday, July 18, 2026, underscore persistent concerns over accountability in public works.

A Mixed Verdict on Government Action

Speaking on the state of flood control projects, Lacson pointed to a disconnect between the government’s reported achievements and the depth of unresolved irregularities. “We have seen improvements in certain areas—new pumping stations, dredging operations, and better coordination with local governments. But when it comes to addressing the anomalies that have plagued these projects for years, the response remains wanting,” Lacson said.

The senator’s comments come amid a backdrop of multiple investigations into alleged overpricing, ghost projects, and procurement irregularities tied to the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). While the agency has touted progress in reducing flood risks in Metro Manila and key provinces, critics argue that corruption continues to undermine long-term solutions.

Key Issues Raised by Lacson

• Lack of Accountability: Lacson emphasized that few officials have been held responsible for past anomalies, creating a culture of impunity.
• Incomplete Reforms: Despite new guidelines on project bidding and monitoring, implementation remains inconsistent across regions.
• Resource Allocation: Funding for flood control has increased, but Lacson questioned whether it reaches intended beneficiaries or is siphoned off through graft.

“The government can claim victories in terms of infrastructure output, but if the system that allowed these anomalies to happen remains unchanged, we are only treating symptoms, not the disease,” he added.

Context and Background

Flood control has been a perennial challenge in the Philippines, with the country ranking among the most vulnerable to climate-related disasters. The DPWH has faced repeated scrutiny over the years, including the controversial “pothole” and “overpriced flood control” scandals that led to Senate inquiries. In 2025, the Commission on Audit (COA) flagged billions of pesos in questionable disbursements for flood management projects.

Recent initiatives, such as the Flood Control Master Plan and the use of satellite monitoring for project progress, have been hailed as steps forward. However, Lacson’s critique suggests that these measures have not fully addressed deep-seated governance issues.

Analysis: The Gap Between Perception and Reality

Lacson’s “tinimbang ngunit kulang” framing is significant. It reflects a broader public sentiment that while the government has made visible efforts—such as clearing waterways and installing early warning systems—the underlying corruption remains unchecked. This disconnect erodes trust and raises questions about the sustainability of flood control investments.

• Political Implications: Lacson, a former presidential candidate and known anti-corruption advocate, may be positioning himself as a watchdog ahead of the 2028 elections. His comments could pressure the administration to intensify investigations.
• Economic Impact: Inefficient flood control costs the economy billions annually in damages and lost productivity. Persistent anomalies could deter foreign investment in infrastructure.
• Social Consequences: Poorly executed projects disproportionately affect low-income communities, which are often the hardest hit by flooding.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

Lacson’s call for a more robust response is unlikely to be the last word on the matter. With the rainy season underway and climate change intensifying weather patterns, the urgency for effective flood control has never been greater. The government must now balance its narrative of progress with concrete actions to root out corruption.

“We need a system that ensures every peso spent on flood control actually protects lives and property,” Lacson concluded. “Until that happens, we will continue to weigh the government’s efforts and find them wanting.”

As investigations continue and public scrutiny mounts, the coming months will test whether the administration can turn its gains into lasting reforms—or whether Lacson’s critique will prove prophetic.